Page last updated

 


 

Scripture Text (NRSV)

 

John 6:56-69

 

6:56 Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them.

6:57 Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me.

6:58 This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever."

6:59 He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum.

6:60 When many of his disciples heard it, they said, "This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?"

6:61 But Jesus, being aware that his disciples were complaining about it, said to them, "Does this offend you?

6:62 Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before?

6:63 It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.

6:64 But among you there are some who do not believe." For Jesus knew from the first who were the ones that did not believe, and who was the one that would betray him.

6:65 And he said, "For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father."

6:66 Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him.

6:67 So Jesus asked the twelve, "Do you also wish to go away?"

6:68 Simon Peter answered him, "Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life.

6:69 We have come to believe and know that you are the Holy One of God."

 

Comments:

 

 

Anyways, this is the Gospel discussion page - Jesus says the flesh is useless - but says those who eat HIS flesh will abide in him and he in them.

v. 66 - I'm not sure I understand WHICH reason many of his disciples turned away. Because of the flesh and blood issue, or because of no one being able to come to him except by the father? and why would it scare them off?

Sally in GA


We sometimes refer to employment as "Bringing Home the Bread." Since our employment in the kingdom has nothing to do with bringing home the "Bread" (Jesus does that for us), we are invited merely to receive with joy the bread of heaven come down for us. We are not celebrating Holy Communion on this Sunday in the church I serve, yet this text invites us to think of that sacrament and partake of the mystical bread of the world. TN Mack


They have no where to go! Is it not the same today. We have no where to go but to the Holy One of God today, it could be that not much has changed. .

Thanks for the Kings Bread tale, and the anaology of the supermarket sampler. They both were effective stories. Nancy-Wi


Dear Brothers and Sisters,

Since I grew up, I gave up fast food places for better fare. But since I have become a parent I am forced on occasion to frequent McDonalds for the literal and not proverbial happy meal. Both MikkyD's and others profess to have a multitude of choices on the menu and some slogan to the effect "have it your way" (Burger King). McD's touts billions served.

God only has one choice of salvation; bread/flesh to eat and blood to drink of Jesus. It only comes one way and quite frankly it is offensive to many. What do you brothers and sisters think this has to say about pluralism and inclusiveness? What would the Pagan say that heard this from the mouth of Jesus. For that matter what really goes on in the mind and heart of the United Methodist (my denomination) that heard last weeks sermon and was invited to take a bite to eat of the flesh and a sip of the saviors blood?

I don't mind telling you this series of sermons have been tough.

Mike in Sunshine, NC.


Mike in Sunshine, NC,

Your point intrigues me. In the church today, so many seem to have been convinced that the belief system is adiaphora, as long as you believe in something. "I'll believe what I want, you believe what you want, and at the end, either we'll both be in heaven, or I will and you won't, and it won't make any difference."

Certainly we don't want to go back to the ways of the Inquisition, but we've forgotten how to evangelize in this politically correct society.

Of course, Jesus did let them walk away, when they couldn't accept the difficult teaching, but he didn't back down and say, "I didn't really mean it."

Let us invite people into the "Cafe of Salvation," but there they will find only one item on the menu: Jesus Christ.

Michelle


Dear Michelle,

Thanks for your comment. I have often struggled with preaching because I end up sounding like a broken record. (For those of you too young to remember what a record was, it was a flat vinyl disk with sound etched into groves. When it malfunctioned it would repead the same sound over and over again.)

In preaching I end up with Christ. I may come about it from a gazillion (that is somewhere past millions, billions, trillions)different ways but I end up there. I have nothing to offer but that. It is served in the Cafe of Salvation and only comes one way and it is not my way! God would make a lousy owner/manager at at a modern fast food place. He would go broke doing it His way and not our way! But I am glad He does not do things our way.

But this teaching is offensive even to the Twelve. Peter's reply is fatalistic. "Gee, Jesus. We would go somewhere else if we thought it would do us any good." In how many ways do people leave churches where the gospel is truly upheld to revert to a nicer teaching?

Thanks again and keep those thougths coming. I need all the help I can get.

Mike in Sunshine, NC.


Mike - you bring up the subject of people leaving when coming face-to-face with the truth of the Gospel (you didn't use those words, though). Boy, did you strike a nerve, my brother!

In my congregation it's not about sexuality, or abortion; it's about race. A mostly older, mostly women, mostly white congregation trying to bridge age and racial gaps (this is a growing younger African American family community) while still trying to battle the values of the Old South within the congregation is tough!

Given the choice of loyalties, folks will stick by their friends.

Further evidence that we have so much energy invested in homeostasis. Where does the voice of prophesy go?

anonymous


lly in GA: You wrote.... "v. 66 - I'm not sure I understand WHICH reason many of his disciples turned away. Because of the flesh and blood issue, or because of no one being able to come to him except by the father? "

I just wanted to add another possibility. Could it have been his teaching that he was the bread - come down from heaven? His response ties together with this, in that he is talking about returning to where he was before.

Maybe it is as simple as it is today - people just can't buy that Jesus really came down from heaven. Good, even amazing person? - OK. But,God? - you must be kidding! Just a thought from, Just another Tom


"In my congregation it's not about sexuality, or abortion; it's about race."

And in my denomination now, with the election of a gay bishop but also a refusal to bless same-sex relationships, it's about sexuality...

It always seems to be about something other than the Gospel, doesn't it?

Somebody (and I've seen this ascribed to many different church leaders throughout history) once wisely commented: "In essentials, unity: in inessentials, liberty: in all things, charity."

I'm not sure that Michelle is correct that "many seem to have been convinced that the belief system is adiaphora, as long as you believe in something..." but I think there are widely varying understandings of what are the essentials, what are the inessentials?

I keep wondering when, in the Anglican tradition of which I am apart, the question of sexuality became an essential.... We have something long-ago agreed too called the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral which says the essentials are (a) Holy Scripture as containing all things necessary to salvation (but not as inerrant or infallible), (b) the two Sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion, (c) the Apostle's and Nicene Creeds as the sufficient statements of face, and (d) the historic episcopate locally adapted. Before that, we had the 39 Articles of Religion. In neither the Quadrilateral nor Articles, do I find anything about sex or sexuality.

In terms of this lesson, and in broader terms than just the current "issue du jour" in the Anglican Communion, what are the "words of eternal life"? What are the essentials? What is the core of the Christian faith around which there can be liberality and experimentation in the inessentials? That answer clearly is different in each tradition and, it seems now as Michelle I think is suggesting, it has become different with each individual. If that is the case -- what has become of the community of faith?

You know what? I don't have to preach this week -- so I am not facing answering these questions right away -- but they aren't likely to go away, so they're still good questions.

Blessings, Eric in OH


"the Apostle's and Nicene Creeds as the sufficient statements of face"

OOPS! "statements of FAITH" ... sheesh!

Eric in OH


The point of the Reformation was to focus the whole life of the church on the gospel. Martin Luther understood the gospel as God's unconditional promise made to the world in the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. Luther also believed and taught that the gospel message is the Church's only reason for being. The Holy Spirit calls, gathers, enlightens, and sanctifies us so that the Word of unconditional promise can be heard clearly in the world.

Why is it so hard for us to get the point? The reason the church came into being was to communicate the gospel in everything that we say and do. We were created to be the church of radical grace; that is the only reason for our existence. We are not here to list conditions that people must fulfill before they can receive God's grace, we are here to live and proclaim that God receives and redeems sinners-—not after we have stopped sinning, but while we are yet sinners. Of course we should preach the Law, but the point of preaching the Law is not to reform people's morals. We preach the Law to point out to all of us that no amount of moral reform will ever merit God's favour.

According to the Scriptures, God will go to almost any lengths to be gracious. God chose Israel and has stuck by that choice through thick and thin, not because Israel was any better than any other nation, but because God is the God of unconditional promise.

Whether it be telling stories of a forgiving father or healing a paralytic lowered through the ceiling, Jesus just couldn't keep from offering grace. Even when it costs him his life, Jesus goes right on forgiving sin. God in Christ scatters the Word everywhere-—even on the most inhospitable soil—-in hopes that somehow in someone the seed will take root and prosper. There are no conditions attached: the father receives the son back, the seed is scattered, the paralytic is healed.

That is grace. That is the gospel. We are crucified with Christ, and we have been raised up in Christ.

I worry about our church when we seem to be losing sight of our reason for being. We are always tempted by the world we live in to tell people that if they would just work hard and think positively, then God will surely reward them with grace. We are tempted to tell people that if they would just get off welfare or change their sexual orientation and "trust God," then God would change them. But that is not now and never can be the gospel. Every time we tell people, "If you would just change, then God will love you," we are siding with Luther's opponents and betraying the gospel which has been entrusted to us to proclaim.

That is not who God created us to be; that is not who the Spirit calls us to be. We have been graciously called to be the Body of Christ—-the crucified and resurrected Body of Christ. We have been put into this world to be just as fanatical as Jesus was about communicating the unconditional grace of God, even if it means that people call us blasphemers.

Rev. Dr. Robert A. Kelly


I came across an illustration on a site called, appropriately enough, "Sermon Illustrations," that seemed to reflect what we in the Church have been doing when it comes to the tough issues.

An old woodsman gives this advice about catching a porcupine: "Watch for the slapping tail as you dash in and drop a large washtub over him. The washtub will give you something to sit on while you ponder your next move."

I am going to call my sermon "Beyond the Washtub." We already know the issues that are going to hurt us, because we are sitting on that washtub trying to contain it. Yet instead of trying to manage our tubs, we need to be following Jesus. And in following Jesus, our flesh is nothing -- apart from serving others as Christ's flesh. And it has to be Christ's blood flowing in our veins if we are to have spirit and life, if his kingdom is to come "on earth as it is in heaven."

OLAS


Rev. Dr. Robert A. Kelly wrote: “Of course we should preach the Law, but the point of preaching the Law is not to reform people's morals. We preach the Law to point out to all of us that no amount of moral reform will ever merit God's favour. According to the Scriptures, God will go to almost any lengths to be gracious. God chose Israel and has stuck by that choice through thick and thin, not because Israel was any better than any other nation, but because God is the God of unconditional promise.”

And I see that clearly stated in Romans 5 passages, including this one:

“But law came in, with the result that the trespass multiplied; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, so that, just as sin exercised dominion in death, so grace might also exercise dominion through justification leading to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. ”

But I don’t feel we can ever preach this honestly without including the chapter that follows it. Beginning with:

“What then are we to say? Should we continue in sin in order that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who died to sin go on living in it? Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life…”

“Newness of life” can bring a total change – possibly even in people’s morals – or at least it seems Paul expected it could. Are “the words of eternal life,” that Peter recognized in Jesus, just heard so that life can go on as it has been - eternally?

I believe, and preach, that change happens within us because of the love of God... not in order to gain God's love.

One of God's New Creations, Just another Tom


Hey my friends,

Have not been on for a couple weeks as I have been toting my Daughter and son all over filling their summer. I have missed your words of inspiration. But I am back and it is my sunday to preach. It is also the week in which we will find out if my daughter's treatments for her cancer have been at all affective, thus determining weather treatment will continue. A frightfull week. But as I read these words, I am comforted. In so many ways it is so simple. God, through Jesus Christ, gives us GRACE!. He feeds our hungry souls with whatever we need. We only need to see. I fight with my fifteen year old as she is angered at the unfairness that is her life. My response to her is that she is right and perfectly justified in her anger. But her anger will only serve to ruin whatever time she may have. It is true of all of us. We block our relationship with God with all kinds of preconceived notions or thoughts. We always feel better if we EARN it. We can't EARN God's grace and we just don't get it. It can't be that easy. And so we walk further from what is before us. The disciples were given an amazing gift....the gift to realize, that while God's way doesn't always make sense in our minds, what other choices are there? "Lord, to whom shall we go". I may not always get it..or understand it, but I always know, "you have the words of eternal life". What more could I ask for?

Just some early thoughts... TAmmy in Texas


Rev. Dr. Robert A. Kelly wrote:

"We are not here to list conditions that people must fulfill before they can receive God's grace." This is true, but I believe the issue is that we try to say we have no need of grace because we haven't really sinned. I believe this is why the Episcopal church and others are struggling with the issue of sexuality. Yet is is not only an issue of sexuality, it is an issue relating to all areas of life. We want to know whether we require grace (forgiveness) for our actions, or not. We don't want to need grace. We want to merit our own salvation.

At the end, we may not be aware that certain of our own our actions in specific areas are sinful. We will need to trust God's grace.

Michelle


Rev. Dr. Robert A Kelly, What a handle! I too am a Rev. Dr. but I usually just go by Pastor Mack. Neither clergy or lay people are very taken by the fact that a Rev. can earn a doctorate degree. This may sound picky and this is meant as light hearted teasing, but a little more grace might let you drop Rev. Dr. from your handle. TN (sometimes rednecked) Mack


TN (sometimes rednecked) Mack

I appreciate your humility(?) Did you tell us you too have a Doctorate? Yep, I appreciate that kind of humility. ;?) Too funny!

I am also... "The Very Right Reverend that leans more to the Left"

;?)

pulpitt in ND


Here's something from Heidi Hustead in "The Christian Century" from 2000

"If anything can help us decide to live in obedience to God’s word it is knowing God’s heart. Our disobedience and our abstinence break God’s heart. Perhaps knowing that might help us make better choices today and tomorrow."

Abstinence is not always a good thing. We keep trying to starve ourselves spiritually.

Sally in GA


This is Mike in Ohio, I am always intrigued with Jesus, just him. I always want my folk to imagine living, yes actually living with this guy. That is what scares us... the absolute "grace" this person, the person of God's sending, offers us again and again and we can continue to have as we live in actual relationships with each other, extending the same grace he extends, day after day , year after year, when life goes stale, even when Jesus gets boring, and his constant emphasis is just people, loving people and STAYING with them for the long haul, staying with each other and him for the long haul... the long chewy haul. When we get tired of the same loaf of bread day in and day out . . . its the disciples who wander away, and personally, I don't know where I would go, like Peter if I wandered away from Jesus. I like many of you have wrestled long nights wondering where I would go. And the answer is the same, there is no one with the words that sustain like Jesus, no one. So I guess, I am linked to him now and forever. God Bless, all of ya... Mike


My sermon for this is "You are what you eat" and will discuss how much time and energy is spent on Adkins diet, South Beach diet but we do not see the heavenly benefit as quickly as we do earthly 'quick fixes". Hope it is a help to get you going. Rev. Carol


Dear Eric,

You pondered the origin of the words "In essentials, unity: in essentials, liberty: in all things, charity." I believe it was the Anglican John Wesley in one of his sermons. The trick is determining the essentials. For that I refer to his remark "Refrain from evil, do good and attend the sacraments." The universal church is struggling with its own moral acts. Some issues are hotter than others. But I maintain there are few people that have any idea the radicalness of Jesus.

Phillip Yancey seems to understand. I got turned on to his audio tapes by a friend. I search the internet for them and keep a new one in the car. I think he gets it and helps me to get it. "What's So Amazing About Grace" might be a good place to start if him if you like to read or listen to audio tapes.

This is a paragraph from sermon for August 24, 2003. I include it because it helps me relate to the two groups that were in the one crowd Jesus was talkiing to, "In this group are really two sets of people listening to Jesus at this point and in English they are both identified as disciples. The larger crowd is referred to in Greek as the mathetes (math-ay-tes') or pupils. These are those that fancy themselves as students of Jesus. They show up when he is healing and teaching. A more modern description of them might be “seeker”. They have come to hear and see but have made no formal commitment to follow. Then there those referred to in Greek as the dodeka (do'-dek-ah) or “The Twelve”. Dodeka literally means twelve. I like to refer to them in terms of the old World War II movie as Jesus’ “Dirty Dozen”.

As I logged on, I was at one of those points where I was ready to walk away. Out of all the things to fight over infant baptism in the UMC is now being called unbiblical a significant portion of younger adults. Apparently no pastor has taught on this subject for 20 years and several have performed re-baptisms with no hesitation. In the UMC that is not the way it is suppose to be. In the end, I have a significantly Baptist crowd who has made it plain to me that I am change my personal beliefs and that of the UMC. They are threatening to leave. My contributions no matter how significant in other areas of the church are all for nothing as I am deemed a heretic.

While I do not want to walk away from Jesus, I do want to walk away from here. But hearing some of the other stories such as Tammy with a daughter with cancer and you and your churches struggle I am ashamed to admit that if you can handle that I think I can handle this. My prayers are with you both.

Mike in the fog Sunshine, NC


Why when you are in the company of Jesus hard sayings seem to be unbearable? What is it that really causes us to depart company with our Lord?

Our culture and opinions of the status quo keep us from sitting still, or standing firm (Paul's teaching this week), we run out the door. After all what would we tell our friends. Jesus is such a scandal.

tom in ga


Mike,

Thanks for the thoughts..here is one for you. Infant baptism is a hot topic in good old Texas. In a community where there are churches all around us with wonderful programming..and lots of cash, we struggle as the little Lutheran church, to explain to those not raised in the faith why we baptise infants. The answer...it is God's grace alone that brings us to him. I was "saved" 2000 years ago as Christ hung on the cross. I cannot earn it. Nore can I take it for granted. We believe that God comes to us in Baptism. Not the other way around. To demand my proclimation of faith for that is to determine that I somehow earn his presence in my life. God is there weather I like it or not... Stand firm on this one my friend. And if, the church chooses otherwise, you are not a lesser man nor minister for it. I will keep you in prayer.

Tammy in Texas


Mike in the fog Sunshine, NC,

Is it possible to stand firm, and allow a significant portion of the congregation (crowd) to walk away, because "this teaching is difficult"? I feel deeply concerned for you and your congregation, but not anxious, for the Spirit is with you, and will see you through.

Michelle


Mike - Hang in there! I've been in that situation a number of times, and it's sticky.

Tammy - my prayers are with you and your daughter.

Sally


Tammy,

Your words reminded me of a story I heard a long time ago of a young man who had just had his experience with Saving Grace and was going around stopping everyone he met with the question of whether or not they had been saved (sort of like the man with the lowered cholesterol in the commercial). He stopped one older man who paused for a moment and replied that he had. When the new believer pressed him for the details, the old man replied, "I believe that it was about 2000 years ago but I just found out about it recently."

Mike in Sunshine, NC, the "mountain Methodists" in Tennessee and Georgia are dealing with the same issues like when one lady once told me she wanted to be baptized "the right way." When God's handling the salvation, I haven't seen any sign that He knows a wrong way.

When I get down to realizing that Christ is the one holding the Words of Life, that takes the load off of me. I only have to point to Him, not to me. Mike in Soddy Daisy, TN (a former tarheel)


Dear Tammy in Texas,

Out of my struggles with this issue, I have put together my own curriculum on Baptism in the UMC. It borrows heavily from our fellow Presbyterians in the use of a video and resource books. But it might be helpful and adaptable for you. I it four one hour session.

Session 1: This is lecture with a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation of notes. It covers thing you need to know about baptism within our denomination and its acceptance among other denominations. It introduces covenant theology.

Session 2: This is a video from Third Millinium productions, "Why do we baptize our children?" It goes indept with the 5 covenants in the OT and then applies their similarities to the Jesus covenant.

Session 3: This is a review of our UM document "By Water and By Spirit". I have T/F, multiple choice and fill in the blank questions based on the document. Students are suppose to have read it before hand but they rarely do. It is still a test that can be negotiated as an open book test where they are free to discuss the answers among themselves. After 1/2 hour I walk them through the answers.

Session 4: We review what we have learned and go through our Baptismal Covenant 1 in the UM Hymnal taking time to identify what is being said by whom, what is happening and what it means.

I have done this twice and it has been very well recieved thus far. If you would like a copy of the notebook I can e-mail it to you but it is a big file. Give me a holler at bagpiper@rfci.net.

Grace and peace, Mike


Father Funston I was so afraid that would happen, and I was hoping it wouldn't happen. I so appreciate your contributions, and wouldn't want the "evil one" to overtake the sincere contributions. I don't care what your handle is, I just don't want you to leave like this. However you must do what you must do. I just hope you read this, and know that I am saddened by this

Shalom

bammamma


Someone better start remembering that what you sow so shall you reap. This is one of those times I wish the Christian name could be taken off and revert to my old fleshly ways.

I'm for Eric in OH. Eric, your insights and resources are a blessing of us. Like one old preacher used to say. He never expected to get 100% approval. 90% was doing well. He figured Satan had 10% in any crowd.

Grace and peace, Mike in Sunshine, NC


Does anyone remember a story by Fred Craddock, it may not have been this exact passage, but there was a powerful dialogue in first person when he said, Jesus asked, "Do you also wish to go away?" He went on to elaborate - I believe on the times in his ministry when he thought of joining the disgruntled crowd and going away... and then he concluded the sermon or story with... "I don't know why, but for some reason I've decided to stay!"...

A friend tells of a story in her home church. Her much beloved pastor from her youth that taught her how to question the intolerances of others, gave her reason to believe in herself, etc. etc. and many other good qualities. He ministered to many and his church was booming by the grace he exuded in his ministry. Years passed, my friend grew up and moed away. Unbeknownst to her, there was a small "crowd" that made life misserable for their pastor. So trusting of his people, he began to doubt his own abilities, they blindsided him and he was so distraught that not only did he leave that church, he left the ministry. She lost track of him... as she had gone on to college, her career and it wasn't until she was home visiting once while she was out shopping she came upon him in a retail store. The "twinkle of his Spirit" had left his eyes and he was now just surviving, his countanance had fallen too... she barely recognized him.

The road is not easy, God calls us to be faithful not perfect.

That image haunts me everytime I think about "throwing it all away" and doing something different in the "secular" world. I will not be bullied for my faith is too strong. Or as I like to say, "I'll give ulcers in God's name, but I'll never 'get' any!" ;?)

With Eric in OH's recent post... it seems we could all be asked if we will "go away" or will we stay trusting in the Spirit that makes us one. Let's be about building up the Spirit of Christ in this world, shall we?

As always, I appreciate the forum here,

with prayers,

pulpitt in ND


To the REAL Eric in Ohio,

I am an infrequent contributor to this forum, but I do read the postings every week. May I tell you that I have received more insight, more intriguing thoughts, more "springboards" from your words than from any other source I implement in my Sunday preparations. Not only are you knowledgable, you are inspired, bringing great gifts to us. Please know you are appreciated by this person who has a difficult time bringing the Scriptures to life each and every week without some input from people like you. Preaching is not my gift (I do far better in other areas of the ministry) - but it is apparently yours. Thank you for what you have offered. It will be missed. We are the poorer for your departure.

Blessings to you, Eric Funston in OH.

KyHoosierCat


To OLAS, thanks for your contribution. I've been really stumped this week -- couldn't seem to get started, but your posting gave me a good push. To Eric in OH, Ditto to what KyHoosierCat said. I get a lot out of the postings of others, but when I log on I always look for yours first! I'm not sure how often I'll return to this site with you gone, but, since we all seem to need your help, I guess I'd like to ask you ... "Do you (really) wish to go away???" Blessings, RevAnitra in NY


I found a quote attributed to Mark Twain, "Most people are bothered by those passages in Scripture which they cannot understand; but as for me, I always notice that the passages in Scripture which trouble me most are those which I DO understand." (Lord, I hope it is from him!)

Regardless, we all have our favorite words and those words from God that trouble us. The troublesome words most often strike at our nature as sinners. These words we wish were not written since they hit home so easily. At times, a worshiper will comment, "You were preaching at me this morning, weren't you?" or "That really hit home, pastor." Abiding in Christ, living in the Gospel means coming to grips with the hard words, daily repenting, and humbly receiving that grace in Jesus Christ. Perhaps the offense in this text is the nearness of God to humanity in the form of Christ. That may be too much to bear. God, far from us, distant and intangible, occasionally speaking to us is o.k., but up close and personal??? Too much, but oh so necessary. ARMY CH E, Heidelberg

All words after quote are mine (I think)


Some late-in-the-week thoughts here. I'm taken back to the time when Israel was aware of polytheism - in fact, several of my good sources have indicated that Israel, from the time of Abraham to the time of the Prophets, believed YHWH was the God above the rest of the gods, not necessarily the ONLY God there was. (To wit, the First Commandment does not say 'There is no other god besides me', it says 'Thou shalt have no other god BEFORE me' which could indicate a belief there WERE other gods, just inferior to YHWH.....Joshua acknowledged there were other gods that people might choose to serve, not telling them "they are figments of the imagination so forget about them, etc.) With these other gods, there was the use of the idol's body for nature purposes (fertility, mostly) Anyway, the Prophetic teachings helped Israel evolve into a monotheistic people, and by the time Jesus came into the world, they were deeply entrenched in the ONE God theology, labeling anyone who had more than one god a "pagan", someone to be ostricized. Now, here came Jesus, speaking of eating his body in order to receive something and putting himself into the position of some kind of a god. To finally get to my point here, I'm wondering if some of these "disciples" were thinking that Jesus was trying to take them back to the time of their ancestors where God was not the only God, but merely one of the pack, and Jesus was trying to put himself in that pack of sub-gods, asking people to do things (eat my flesh) that Israel now found repugnant to their faith in YHWH. Faith in God had come a long way over the centuries, and now were they being asked to take great leaps backwards? This may have been at least a part of their thinking. I realize much of this is highly debatable, but I think it may have some credence.

This is all in the back of my head as I attempt to complete my sermon and bulletin for Sunday. I'm leaning toward the "Jesus had the authority to make claims about himself" theme, but am not quite ready to put the last period on it yet.....

KyHoosierCat


I am struck by wht happened to us who use this site, and this particular pericope this week. One of our own had to withdraw. Others of us pleaded with them not to withraw. I wonder were there those who asked disciples who left Jesus if they would please stay and not leave the fold?

Shalom

bammamma


Dear Tammy in TX

We have interesting family discussions as my parents and I are United Methodsits (who understand and except both infant and adult baptism), my brother and sister-in-law and their faily are Baptists (who, of course believe in adult, believers, baptism) and my sister and brother-in-law and their family are MS Lutherens (and of course you understand where their comming from). How nice to see we (the Lutheren's and United Methodists) can aggree on at least one thing, that in baptism God comes to us, not the other way around. God's grace is sufficient and we do not have to earn it; cannot earn it. Blessings to all and Shalom, Rev. Nancy in NE (USA)


I am a new "post"er with a background in this highly technical website stuff.

I can't believe that this site is using a simple "submit form" to post comments to the website. I'm very surprised that more unwanted "spamming" hasn't occurred.

A simple moderated bulletin board with username and password would avoid problems like the ones which have happened this week.

P.S. I appreciate all of the thought provoking discussion...

KB in MN


KB in MN Could you email Frank Schaefer and talk to him about this? It would help the less sophisticated website persons like me.

Shalom

bammamma


Eric in OH, In case you give this page one last, loving look, PLEASE, don't stop coming here and participating! Remember the wheat and the tares! Let us help sort out the true from the false. I think, with God's help, we can get through this mess. I don't think our anonymous plagiarizer necessarily has bad intent, or he/she would probably at least use a screen name, as most of us do. Maybe we can appeal to this person's good will and convince him/her to be a little more careful of the rules, written & unwritten, we all try to live by here. Anyone who might know Eric and be in email contact with him, you certainly have my permission to send my remarks to him. We have survived some pretty dicy posters on this site (I won't mention names). We need to show love & tolerance for one another, and help keep this site as a productive, useful place for "Desperate Preachers." Ken in WV


I've been struggling with keeping a sabbath. Yesterday (Thursday) I staked a claim on the day, and stayed home from the church. Only got two phone calls. Did a lot of catching up, household projects, bills and correspondence, picking vegetables from our exhuberant garden, working out at the gym, reading. Yes, it was very refreshing!

But as I was talking to God through writing in my journal last night, I realized that we all go away from God by our own passion for accomplishing things. I didn't feel shamed by God in this realization, I was just reminded that there is another path. Lotsa people write that there is a God who longs for us, yearns for our attenton and our company. Do we who have to be non-stop accomplishers also want to go away?

kbc in sc


Thanks everybody for your contibutions. I find them most helpful in my preperation. Tongue in cheek ... we have images of cannibalism and body armour. Perhaps those of the early church were a little anxious that people would take Jesus words to refer to them and decided they needed to take some precautionary measures to prevent them becoming a feast themselves.

Peace Gordon Castlemaine, Australia


I'll add my voice to the chorus in support for the real Eric in OH. I long ago tired of the inevitable long first posting, although I'm evidently not well-read enough to recognize that parts were plagiarized. I don't know whether that writer is the same one spam/slamming Eric, but whatever, people need to get a life and act like (Christian) grownups.

Laura in TX


Dear Desperate Preachers - I like a few here have never posted before yet I read nearly every week the words here. The words I usually realize that God wanted me to see. Dear Dear Dear Eric. You have touched my ministry in so many ways with your thought provoking words of wisdom. You have been completely unselfish in the giving of yourself to help those of us who sometimes struggle. Please keep on keeping on my brother. I for one thank God for you nearly every week.

Amy in NE


Like others, have never submitted before but having to preach almost every single week, I have found this site a constant source of inspiration and support. Thanks for the story of the king/two beggars and loaves last week - and to Mike in Ohio, Dr Kelly for this week's contributions - and for so many helpful insights in the past from Eric of OH. Please don't spoil this site. Who knows, one day I may have something I feel worth contributing. Frances in UK


I add my often silent voice to all the others, asking the real Eric in OH not to abandon this wonderful site, on which he has become such a gracious presence. I read often, post seldom, because there are so many gifted preachers out there offering golden nuggets that bring my sermons to life. (Responding to the discussion re giving credit where credit is due, I do!) Thanks to all of you! I second the motion someone made earlier of contacting Frank Schaefer to ask about pass words and i.d.'s for posters, and just pray it can be done in such a way that will maintain accessibility for those who are not (yet!) members. (I am, but haven't always been.)

Like the real Eric in OH, I wish you all many blessings - Frandy


Greetings,

I am a seminary student who is just about to finish an internship and my third year of seminary. This year has been challenging and somewhat discouraging. BUT, it is almost gratifying to hear again that seasoned ministers wrestle with all of the same sorts of issues that I have found in my brief tenure as a student intern.

In the end, though ... what does it matter? In this world there will be trouble but Jesus has overcome the world. Preach it. We need to hear it.

Susan in Omaha


I am another one who reads DP every week and knew that the posting to Rick in Canada to 'mind his own business' was not Eric. Whoever it is doing this is wounded and fear-filled. I am sorry for the whole mess and pray, Eric, that you will just come on with a new moniker.....we will know you! As for the talk about Rev or Doc or whatever.....be careful, all, that may or may not be real bantering as well. Peace, DL+


To Eric in Ohio: Identity theft is THE problem of the day. Don't leave us. Spurred some thinking. Jesus is the greatest victim of identiy theft. We make him what we want. We project onto him our own prejudices. We make him what we want him to be. That's why today's (8/24) passage is so important. Jesus cut through all preconceived ideas about him. "Eat my flesh . . . drink my blood." And so those who wanted him to be what they wanted "drew back." Even the closest disciples were nonplused. His words offended them. But they knew he had the "words of eternal life." So they continued to follow him despite their misgivings. A true act of faith: they followed despite their difficulties with him. I ministered with mentally retarded persons for 18 years. They didn't understand very much. But they believed and expressed more unconditional love than "normal" people. We want to understand and accept. Sometimes faith is a leap beyond understanding. Many thanks to Soren Kierkegaard from the land of my ancestors.

revhen in NY


"Blessed are you who take no offense," my spiritual director kept telling me. And I need to hear it. Seems to fit this conversation and the passage of discussion. Both taking offense and both leaving. There was even discussion about another "leaving" and setting up another chat room. Coincidence? Is not the Lord helping us to understand how easy it is to leave, to take offense - so if one were to stay and contribute or stay and feed on Christ (no equivocaton intended)one would most likely have to decide that it doesn't matter what a person says or does to me. I am dying to my self and feeding on the life of Christ. The offense may be the realization that there is no free lunch here anymore. It costs to be a disciple. It cost my own wants, desires,... life. Shalom, Al in Richmond


Craddock's story begins..."We heard what Jesus said to the disciples of old? "Do you ALSO wish to go away?" That is a heavy question - to lift up ? but still it is there - unavoidable. It is heavy because Jesus asks ALSO - "Do you ALSO wish to go away?" His question clearly implies that some others have already gone. "Do you also wish to go away?" The very fact that he asks us implies that we MAY. - And for some of us THAT can be frightening." ... is the opening to it...

pulpitt in ND


We have had to wrestle with rough questions at our house. "I believe in God, but what if the others are right?" Questions of a 15 year old facing death issues daily. I have found myself grasping for answers and then checking my theology. So far so good. But ultimately, there are few "answers" and only faith. Christianity is not a faith where one should check their brain at the door. it is a faith that is grounded in truth and so searching is not frighting to God. But We ARE dealing with GOD. And in the end, there will be unanswered questions. There will be the "why did you do it that way?" sort of things. Or how do you expect me to do that? But isn't that really what faith is about. Standing firm even when we don't quite understand. The words of Peter are so very true..."Lord to whom shall we go?" Whatever questions are left when we wrestle with our faith, no one has a better answer than God in Christ Jesus. We can look elsewhere, but I think we shall find that the answers will always be found best in Christ. so let me share this prayer today.."Lord Jesus, I just don't get it all. I want all the answers and with each answer comes even greater questions. The more I know of you, the more I realize you ARE GOD, and you are far greater than my mind can comprehend. When I am weary and tired; When I am frustrated and angry; when I am afraid; and above all, when I have no answers for my child, Hold me tighter. For I have learned, there is no greater place than in your presence...even when I am confused...AMEN"

God be with all of you as you open yourselves to the spirit in your ministry.

Tammy in Texas.


Thanks for sharing Tammy... I think you are correct in our searching... and finding the presence of the Spirit...

Thank you for the prayer as well...

Blessings,

pulpitt in ND