Page last updated

 


 

Scripture Text (NRSV)

 

James 3:1-12

 

3:1 Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers and sisters, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.

3:2 For all of us make many mistakes. Anyone who makes no mistakes in speaking is perfect, able to keep the whole body in check with a bridle.

3:3 If we put bits into the mouths of horses to make them obey us, we guide their whole bodies.

3:4 Or look at ships: though they are so large that it takes strong winds to drive them, yet they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the will of the pilot directs.

3:5 So also the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great exploits. How great a forest is set ablaze by a small fire!

3:6 And the tongue is a fire. The tongue is placed among our members as a world of iniquity; it stains the whole body, sets on fire the cycle of nature, and is itself set on fire by hell.

3:7 For every species of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by the human species,

3:8 but no one can tame the tongue--a restless evil, full of deadly poison.

3:9 With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God.

3:10 From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this ought not to be so.

3:11 Does a spring pour forth from the same opening both fresh and brackish water?

3:12 Can a fig tree, my brothers and sisters, yield olives, or a grapevine figs? No more can salt water yield fresh.
 

Comments:

 

As we begin to look at another sermon from James I must confess that I abhor this passage. I abhor it because it is convicting to the very depths of my soul. In high school I had come to the place where I thought cursing was fun. The people I hung around and listened

George Carlin and Richard Pryor for hours on end. We had cursing games where the person who said the most curse words in the stupidest sentences would win. More often than not, I won. I can also be a negative, arrogant, judgmental person. James exposes the person who can bless God in one breath and rain down curses on those made in His image. Even today after 20 years of heavenly rehabilitation I still fear letting a curse word slip in casual conversation or (God forbid) from the pulpit.

For all James’ plain spoken ways, he is radical in his profound and practical teaching. Tongues are to be used to bless, edify and praise. We bless the father and curse the Republicans (or Democrats), the Asian workers steeling our jobs away from us, the Mexican immigrants moving into our neighborhoods, etc. But James’ teaching if it is true means we have to stop backbiting, nagging and complaining. What shall we ever do? He tells us to stop. Then he admits the tongue is untamable. We are in trouble now.

Before the modern world, the tongue was the way to communicate for the masses. Few of all the people who lived wrote “books”. The tongue is still used as the primary means of blessing or execution of characters but it is vastly aided by telephones and email today. Imagine if you can every word we have ever spoken or written being recorded. It is being done.

Just musing instead of sleeping.

Grace and peace. Mike in Sunshine.


Most people tend to read this passage and focus on the negative aspects of the use of the tongue. I want to approach this passage on this particular Sunday from the positive: "The Tongue: The Trailblazer for Ministry." Used rightly, we have no greater wheapon for justice, no great balm for the troubled soul, and really no other means to bring people to Christ than the tongue. The key is the kind of heart and soul behind the tongue. TN Mack


vv 9-11 are reminiscent of last week's "if any would uphold the law, but fail to keep one part of it, he/she is accountable for all of it." (or loosely remembered)

It's about our faith showing in our works. Whether we want it to show or not, or whether or not we're even aware of it, it shows.

There was a line in "Silence of the Lambs" - when Clarice (Jodie Foster) was holding her boss accountable for his trying to treat her daintily when they examined the dead body with some police officers. He said something like, "it doesn't matter; I know you're competent." She replied, "the police look to you on how to act. If they see you treating me this way, they'll think that's the way to treat women. It matters, Sir."

It matters what we say. It matters how we act. Our tongues reveal what's inside.

Sally in GA


I'd love to just come out and say, the next time someone uses a racial word, "that word has no place in the kingdom of God."

Sally


TN Mack - you're onto something GOOD! Yes, rather than "preaching" at our congregations about the evils of the tongue, how about the encouragement to "do right."

Gee, I'm talkative today. BTW - thank you all for the discussion last week; worship and the sermon went wonderfully. We went 5 minutes over and no one minded!

Sally


The author of James warns against the power of human speech and the difficulties of controlling the tongue. With our mouths we have the capacity both to bless God and to curse.


I know this is off the mark ,but I need the collective wisdom of those who contribute to this site. Does anyone have resources for an infant dedication, not infant baptism. The couple isn't interested in baptizing their baby, but are interested in dedicating their baby to the Lord. I am a firm believer in infant baptism, but said I would do some checking out.

Thanks,

Tennessean


Tennessean, The only denomination that I know using that term is the Baptist church. If you cannot find an actual ritual, you might simply use the words of the of sponsorship and Christening, "Do you in presenting this child intend to bring up this child under the guidance of the church and live a life that becomes the Gospel?" (We do) "What name is given this child?" (Name) (Sprinkle the child or pour water over his or her head) "With this water we proclaim that (Name) is a child of God and ask that (he/she) receive God's blessing and be led by Christian example and precept until (he/she) confesses Christ as (his\her) own savior."

I would be inclined not to use water at all and just kiss the child as a symbol of God's love being at work in his or her life. I would not give up easily as a UM pastor on the idea of persuading the parents to have the child baptized. TN Mack


Tennessean: the United Methodist Book of Worship does have "An Order of Thanksgiving for the Birth or Adoption of a Child" on pages 585-587. The instructions state that "It should be made clear to the participants that this act is neither an equvalent of nor a substitute for Holy Baptism but has and entirely different meaning. This act is appropriate prior to the presentation of the child for baptism, or if the child has been baptized elsewhere and is being presented for the first time in the congregation where his or her nurture is to take place."

If you don't have access to a UM Book of Worship, e-mail me at ktutterowjumc@northstate.net and I will type it out and e-mail it to you.

Grace and Peace

Kirk in Jamestown NC


Tennessean: the United Methodist Book of Worship does have "An Order of Thanksgiving for the Birth or Adoption of a Child" on pages 585-587. The instructions state that "It should be made clear to the participants that this act is neither an equvalent of nor a substitute for Holy Baptism but has and entirely different meaning. This act is appropriate prior to the presentation of the child for baptism, or if the child has been baptized elsewhere and is being presented for the first time in the congregation where his or her nurture is to take place."

If you don't have access to a UM Book of Worship, e-mail me at ktutterowjumc@northstate.net and I will type it out and e-mail it to you.

Grace and Peace

Kirk in Jamestown NC


TN Mack, thanks for your help. And no I haven't given up easily. We're still talking, but I needed some input if I can't convince them to have the baby baptized.

Tennessean


Tennessean,

Since I'm Presbyterian and we do encourage the baptsim of infants, I went looking for some sources outside Methodist, Presby, Lutheran, etc. I found a website for a church called "Curwensville Alliance" that does not believe in the baptism of infants, but does a Dedication service instead.

It's basically an explanation of what parents must be willing to do to raise their child in Christ, but you could certainly use it as a springboard for questions to present to parents at a service. It sounds OK to this Presbyterian, even though, like you, I'm all for infant Baptism.

KyHoosierCat


Tennessean,

My prayers are with you in this matter as a pastor whose church was hurt recently in such a matter. I offer only the practical advice not as a member of the Ministry Police but simply as one who has recently been through much pain over the matter. Do not use water, do not call it anything but a christening or baptism and do not write it up on the church records as if it were a baptism if it was a dedication.

The word Christen implies a baptism in most denominiations that use the term officially or unofficially. The clergy that conducts christenings believe that is the one baptism of a child brought up in a Christian household. But for those who harbor more baptist beliefs in their minds it is a little baptism now with the real thing to follow later. I have stopped using the term christen myself and I have found that my congregations mind is much clearer on the subject for giving up the term.

Our crisis occured because a christening was done with water and the Trinity upon the birth of a child 8 years ago. The records confirm that the pastor believed it to be a baptism. When the family came back "for the real thing" a two months ago I said no to the baptism and yes to the affirmation of his faith. I was accused of withholding faith and baptism from the child. It turns out there was little counciling or clarity on the subject given.

TN Mack inclination is on track not to use water. In the end it is imparitive to distinguish the two acts and do one but not the other and record the decision accordingly for later pastors. It is important!

Mike in Sunshine


v. 12 Can a fig tree yield olives, or a grapevine figs?

Can a dedication yield a baptism? hmmmmm

I was in that sticky situation once, and I put a rose in a vase on the altar - one for each baby born that year. I allowed this particular couple and the baby to come forward and I gave her (the baby) the rose and said, "I want you to know, that even though you'll be brought up in two faith traditions, you are welcome to worship here and have our church as a part of your life." Then I prayed for ALL the babies and chidlren. I made it clear that I didn't do infant dedications. So, though I let them come forward in the service, I wouldn't single out that child for dedications; we "dedicate" all children to Christ.

One of the grandmothers was upset, but the couple wasn't.

And, I agree, DO NOT USE WATER!!!!! They used water when they dedicated me, and I have no idea what they did!!! All I know it was in a Baptist church, so it wasn't a baptism.

Also, DO NOT SAY CHRISTENING OR BAPTSIM!!!! My mom told me all along that I wasn't baptised, but only christened. Frankly, I was confused myself, and so was my pastor at the time, when I came under conviction and didn't know whether I should be baptised or not.

Sally


hmmm. it seems we've rather enjoyed the 'distraction' from the text posed by the question of dedication. As a Mennonite looking in on this conversation I'll offer that we too are part of that messy anabaptist movement from 500 years ago that believed faith to be something necessary chosen and claimed by the mind of one able to decide for oneself. (the "ana" part of anabaptist indicating a re-baptism or a baptism again to symbolise a second act baptism embraced at a place closer to adulthood even if this rite has been performed in childhood. For what it's worth, one of my favorite parts of child dedication is when the pastor carries the child up and down the isles, presenting this child as a charge to the entire faith community to collectively 'own' the roles of nurture, faith-shaping, mentoring, and journeying together on the path of faith both in anticipation of this child's eventual owning of faith and in committment to the long-haul regardless of the particular faith/life choices of the growing child. What a thrill to see the child's parents embraced by a faith community who pledges to walk the road in solidarity with them!

Perry in Elmira Ontario


What I love about this text in communication with the other lections is the freedom to simply admit that my words don't have to be always perfect -especially if I'm feeling like crap and the temptation is to say something nice that essentially makes a liar out of me. While James acknowledges that the tongue can't be tamed anyway, the pslamist and Isaih give us the freedom to speak nasty thoughts about those who have become like enemies to us. God can take it no matter how 'raw' the words are.

And what about all this (inapropriate??)authority being given to an organ of the human body anyway? This morning I was thrilled when my 10year old daughter caught this during our family devotions and said " hey the tongue just speaks the words that are already on the brain!" Then we went to acknowledge that a hurting word is often every bit as much the problem of the one hearing it and blowing it out of perspective as it is the fault of the one speaking it. I like the gospel piece that shows how Peter's words (whatever they were) once spoken, became an entry point for Jesus to make a point of correction. I believe it is better to speak one's mind and be open to correction than to say what's nice and perpetuate falsehood. So my sermon is leaning towards something like "Can I be honest with you"

I read James somewhat like OT wisdom liturature; a collection of quips and truths from the sages that have a significant place...but aren't intended to be pursued literally ALL the time.

Perry from Elmira


But aren't these little forays off the main trail fascinating? I love getting a little peek at what is going on in the ministries of others.

KyHoosierCat


"The greatest single cause of atheism is Christians who profess Jesus with their lips, then walk out the door and deny him with their lifestyles. This is what the unbelieving world finds unbelievable."

--dcTalk, but original source unknown to me


adding the Gospel lesson:

v. 9 - "with our tongues we bless God and curse those made in his likeness."

Like Peter, we also proclaim to Christ "You are the Messiah" and then turn around and rebuke him in the next breath.

I see this as a continuation of the spiritual battle idea that began in the lections several weeks ago (the armor of God). The battle is in taming the tongue, but we can't do it, says James. Rather, our tongues will reflect the condition of our hearts (Perry, thanks for sharing what your daughter said), so in order to tame the tongue, a task beyond willpower, it is necessary to get out of the way so Jesus can alter our hearts.

Love the saying, "If God is your co-pilot, change seats." It's like this - rather than asking God to help us do the right thing, ask God to use us to do HIS thing!

Sally in GA


When I went to college eons ago, in the 60's before my call before many women went to college. Swearing or cursing had nothing to do with God but everything to do with acceptance. Boy, did I learn it well. To tell the truth it is also a fairly hard habit to break. I love to say to someone who has just said, "Jesus Christ" in a non respectful way. "Oh where, Is he here now? and walk away. It is also strange to hear an avowed athesist screaming, "God, Damn it!" or just using the word, "God, I can't believe it" and not really knowing what that could mean or can mean. Must there be meaning behind the word, the person actually beliving in Christ or God? Nancy-Wi


Here in Montana we understand the devistation,loss and heartach caused by a little spark that sets the forest on fire. It has claimed thousands and thousands of acres of forest, I don't know how many homes in all and has cost millions in dollars to help fight it back and protect people from its path of destruction. And we all ask, how did they start. Some are started by lightening, one has been traced to human disregard and neglect at a campsite. This one burned and is still buring one of our National treasures - Glaicer National Park. In addition there are all the sicknesses that are worsened because of the smoke we breath day in and day out. You can not get away from it. It travels for miles by the whim of the wind.

To hear that the words that I speak can be as destructive as a forest fire should surely reach my heart and soul. In William barklay's "The Daily Study Bible Series - The Letters of James and Peter" he quotes Ecclesiasticus or Jesus the son of Sirach, 28:13-26, not to be confused with Jesus the son of Joseph and Mary. These are words that the text suggests would have been used in the early Christian Community. You can find them in any Bible with the Apocryphia in it.

They are powerful descriptions of the damage that a tongue wrongfuly used can cause. But there is a good word of encouragement in it also. vs. 22 "It (the tongue speaking slander and evil) has no power over the godly; they willnot be burned in its flame. God's word can refresh our minds and spirits regarding how to conduct ourselves in ways that bring peace, joy and love instead of destruction, saddness and hate!! I heard on the radio this am that laughter can help to heal pain and has been scientificly proven. The speaker suggested that one of the greatest gifts we can leave our faimily is "laughter in the walls." How much better off is the world with a family that laughs together in joy(not riticule) instead of hearing words of condemnation. Lord let me leave my children the inheritence of laughter and kind words. "A soft answer [word] turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger." Proverbs 15:1 There are others there that also give wise council in regard to our words. "A word aptly [fitly] spoken is like apples of gold in a setting of silver." Proverbs 25:11

Whew, not sure how I am going to go with all this, but I think it is such an important text!! I am also thinking on how we criticize each other in the Body of Christ from one denomination to another. Robbi Zacariah said one sunday that when preachers/pastors get before God they will most likely find tht they did more to damage the Body of Christ and others becoming a part of it than anyone else because of the critical spirit among us. He also stated that as he worked with people of Eastern religions one of the biggest drawbacks for them in believing in Christ was the hate and bitterness between those of us who call ourselves Christians.

enough enough of my words and look they are condeming - yeiks!!!! signing off with my foot in my mouth. jmj in mt


jmj in mt. Nice posting. Thanks for your thoughts. It reminded me of the time when a church asked its pastor to leave because the pastor had the abominable practice of meeting with the other clergy in town once a month and participating in the community worship services twice a year. They found it deplorable that he would "mix" with those who were "theologically deviant" (no lie!!). The deviant persons among us were apparently the Catholic priest and the Presbyterian clergywoman. Anyway, this is the garbage filling the ears and the hearts of the children, prejudices that won't take long to be expressed in the public arena - to the third and fourth generation. While the sanctuary resounds with songs of how We are One in the Spirit, you must first be one of us before it applies. As Perry's bright daughter said, if it's in your heart, it will come out of your mouth. (Well, that's a paraphrase.......)

KyHoosierCat


Thinking about Using James as my main point and Mark to illustrate Title " The Good, The Bad and The Ugly" How the Tongue can be used for good, and the breath bad... or even ugly...Do you fell Lucky? Go Ahead make my day Clerically Blonde


To the unsigned person who used the following quote from dc talk's "Jesus Freak" CD, a prelude to the song "What If I Stumble?":

"The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians who profess Jesus with their lips, then walk out the door and deny him with their lifestyles. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable."

The quote -- and voice -- is that of Brennan Manning, author of "The Ragamuffin Gospel," "The Signature of Jesus," "Abba's Child" and others. Manning's "Ragamuffin Gospel" is definitely worth the read. The late Rich Mullins said the book was a changing point in his life and eventually named his band "The Ragamuffin Band."


Actually, a check of my records notes the quote as such: “The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips, then walk out the door and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable.”

Only slightly different, but the journalist in me wanted to be accurate.

PastorBuzz, and managing editor of a smalltown newspaper, in Tennessee
 


Tennessean,

There is a dedication service for children attached to this website, from the home page, click on worship service prep (in the column to the left) there will be special services, one is for the dedication of children.

Love "the Good the Bad and the Ugly" sermon title, seems fitting for a sermon about the tongue, I too want to emphasize the good but recognize the bad and ugly. The bad is the stuff we all recognize is not good to say (cursing or obvious racial slurs) because we all know we should not say it. For me, the ugly is the stuff that is demeaning and degrading to others, but is socially acceptable still. Whacko,psycho, fruitcake come to mind (given my background in mental health), or even things such as "honey" (especially when used by used car salesmen or your supervisor/CEO,"little girl" , "boy" (often used by an older individual when talking down to a forty year old) etc.

Have to confess although I have seen my share of Clint films but can not remember the storyline of this one other than it was a western....

ks in me


Good = a loner on the trail of stolen gold Bad = a mean-spirited bounty hunter Ugly= a Mexican bandito

Though they have their "titles", the irony of the movie is that the "good guy" isn't such a saint. It's basically a statement against the old Western movies that replace the true grittiness of the real Old West with "the guy in the white hat" mentality.

I don't know if this helps anyone going with the Good, Bad and Ugly theme or not. Just thought I'd throw this in.

From a Clint Eastwood movie non-fan, KyHoosierCat


Regarding Infant Baptism (sorry to keep off track): In the UCC, we acknowledge both infant and adult baptism. The choice is up to the parent. Personally, I don't believe there is a right or wrong time for baptism, and I caution you, fellow pastors and teachers, to remember Jesus' words from the gospel of Mark 7:6 He said to them, "Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written, 'This people honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; 7:7 in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.'

Let's not teach human precepts as doctrines. Our baptismal traditions are HUMAN PRECEPTS. Insisting on our own personal preferences and traditions when working with parents can cause hurt and misunderstanding. On the other hand, if you can take the time to explain your views of baptism and other views of baptism and then let the parents decide, well then, that can be such a good use of your tongue! I guess I am not off the track afterall!

JFK


Just to follow up on JFK. In the Disciples of Christ we only do "believers" baptism. I do baby dedications quite often. As for a resource, the National Council of Chruches had an excellent one but it is out of print. It was a service and a certificate all in one. It asked the questions of intention of the parents to raise the child with all that was needed for an abundant life. Not just religiously but also health care, food, clothing. It was very specific about their intentions to take the best care of this gift. Then I added an element to the service. I requred the congregation to pledge to help the parents keep their pledge by loving, guarding and guiding both the child and the parents.

I'm looking at the James text and want to being in the idea of silence as a way of dealing with the tongue and what is on our mind. If we can teach ourselves to be silent and listen actively (both to one another and to God) then I believe that we won't have to commemorate another 9/11 type day.

SoCal Longhorn


Regarding the quote on the "greatest single cause of atheism is Christians who profess Jesus with their lips, then walk out the door and deny him with their lifestyles" I submit this possibility: the greatest single cause of atheism is people who do not want to believe, finding Christians who profess Christ with their lips, then walk out the door and deny them with their lifestyles as a "reason not to believe." Pastor Grandma in NNY


Amen @ pastor Grandma!

I've found this, too - despite my witness (and it's not an in-your-face-slap-you-upside-the-head-with-a-Bible type) and their admission that I'm more (to quote one) "cerebral," I find that my greatest difficulty is in trying to live down their prejudices. Prejudice, no matter who holds it or why, is ultimately a choice.

Sally


Dear JFK,

Human Precepts? True biblical doctrine? Can you always tell the difference? Here's the rub in my situation. I was labeled "unbiblical" and emphasizing human precepts over biblical concepts by saying no to a rebaptism when the family readily admited that the child had indeed been baptized already. This was by a group who proclaimed to teach the truth about the subject in the clearest, purest biblical sense and used good old Isaiah. A few other families claimed to have had their child dedicated or christened and not baptized even though the historical evidence showed the contrary. Ironically nowhere the scriptures has was a child dedicated. Thus it is a non-biblical pracitice. Thus those practicing an unbiblical practice (dedicating) were calling the one whose theology (my own and the church's) heretical. Christening (a latin term) was a term used later but implied a baptism. Water was used and and the Holy Spirit invoked. But this term also does not appear.

But for the many reformed Protestant denominations that kept the practice of infant and child baptism, we claim that indeed it is a biblical practice and not just human precept. There are four instances of head of households and the rest of the household being baptized in the NT. That among other texts is the basis for infant and child baptisms in those denominations that do them. It is called covenant theology and has its basis in the 5 previous OT covenants whose great lessons and similarities outweigh the differences.

Like every good heretic, I/we might be wrong but I have more bible resources behind my arguments than do those who disaggree with me. So who is teaching human precept verses biblical truth.

Now I am a laid back kind of guy. I recognize the church of today has and does many things the first century church does not and did not have. But for those who are in this case working from a literalist standpoint to shoot down infant baptism "because it is not there" when in fact they are doing and thinking things that are not in the NT scripture is ironic to the max.

I agree we need to take time to explain each of our church's traditions. Thus I am offering courses on the subject to anyone willing to listen. In living through this episode I have had a chance to see how many other churches and pastors have dealt with the theological tension. Many simply just do what people ask (dedicate, christen, rebaptize) and do so believing it isn't a big deal or seeing themselves as more spiritual.

I offer myself and resources I have gleaned and use on the subject. I will even send you my 4 session course I have developed on the subject. I would like to see what organized class or counseling session you (or everyone else) has to offer. You can contact me at bagpiper@rfci.net.

Grace and peace, Mike in Sunshine


Mike in Sunshine,

Just a few thoughts, in tones friendly......

I may need to ask if the consecration of Samuel to the Lord by his mother Hannah might not be considered an OT version of baby dedication. While Hannah was having him raised as a Nazarite, it was still a commitment she made to God about her son and in the way he would be raised. (I Samuel 1)

The same question might be asked of Jesus' own presentation at the Temple where, following the Law, Mary and Joseph "brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord"

I concede Jesus' presentation was Law only for males and for firstborn males at that, but still, is it possible these Scriptural texts speak enough to the practice of infant dedication to cause some Christians to adhere to it?

Mind you, I and my denomination are proponents of infant Baptism, but I can clearly understand the Biblical roots for waiting until the "age of reason" is attained.

The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Baptism, Section 4 would basically agree with you on the subject of Infant Baptisms taking place. CONVERTS to Christianity were baptized along with their entire households. It wasn't until the time of Paul (or thereabouts) that baptism became the replacement rite (now Sacrament) for the infants of already believing Christians. There are several instances of apparent infant baptisms in the early church writers.

So, there are many theories. I plead ignorance on which God prefers.

:-) KyHoosierCat


To KyHoosierCat,

Thanks for the reply.

Samuel as you note was born under the law and was circumcision as a first born child. Of his mother's special vow; it creates more problems than it answers. Samuel was one of two lifelong nazerites from birth. Samson was the other one. 50/50 good and questionable; good odds? Under the current age of enlightment, believer only baptism thought this was a violation of his rights since he did not have anything to say about.

Jesus was also a first born and this was also about the time he would have been circumcised according to the law. The dedication was the act of making him an official Israelite in relationship to the law. This to violates the reasoning of a believers only circumcision/baptism. I am glad he did not mind.

My problem is when I speak on our stance as denomination I do so with the understanding that "We might be wrong but this is the best we have to offer". The ones of which I refer offer their beliefs with the assurance they are right and it is God's view.

Any good parent wants to do "the right thing". I respect that. However to sit in the pews of a UMC which believes in baptizing (not dedicating or christening) both believers AND their children and that this baptism for both is one time thing then get upset when a clergy person upholds the teaching is mystifying. Maybe I am strange but when I made the transition from Southern Baptist (born, raised and educated thusly) it was a given that UM's and other baptized babies. I guess I never considered that information was withheld or miscommunicated to so many in a local church.

Grace and peace, Mike


Dear Tennessian (did I spell that correctly?)

In my church UMC we do infant baptisms. Some parents don't believe / understand infant baptism Consquently, I use the same passage in the Book of Worship that I do for infant baptism, except I use the word "dedicate" instead of "baptize." I ask the parents if they will "bring the child up . . ", and "dedicate this child to you, Father, in the name of your Son, Jesus Christ. I ask that your Holy Spirit be present in and for (name)to protect him from the evil one." (Something along those lines) I usually go over it with the parents first, but refuse to compromise the scripture or Book of Worship. This usually meets what they are seeking. And, who knows, it sounds like a "real" baptism to me....Texian


"Like Peter, we also proclaim to Christ "You are the Messiah" and then turn around and rebuke him in the next breath." Thank you Sally in GA for the connection. For others like myself still in the process of writing your sermon, this passage reminded me of an Emily Dickinson poem I learned in high school. Short and to the point -- "A word is dead when it is said, I say it just begins to live that day." LH in NJ


Dear Friends,

What a lively bunch you are this week! I tend to lurk (and thus I owe all of you much thanks for your contributions to my sermons over that past two years, God Bless you all) as opposed to offering up my input, but I'm more inspired than usual this week so here goes.

Firstly, to Tennessean, I am a Baptist and thus I hold to believer's baptism, but I was raised in the United Church of Canada which was formed by Presbyterians, Methodists & Congregationalists, for whom infant baptism was the norm. I submit that there are biblical cases to be made for both infant & believer's baptism, therefore I tend to be guided by Paul's words in 1 Cor. 10-17, and thus, brothers and sisters, I agree with all of you in Christ. If you are still looking for resources for a child dedication I suggest "Baker's Worship Handbook" (Paul E. Engle, Baker Books, 1998).

Now to James. I've been reading Eugene H. Peterson's "Working the Angles: the Shape of Pastoral Integrity" yet again, and I'm deeply affected by his focus on God's speech which created all. Peterson asserts that we live in a reality "spoken" into being by God. He continues by also asserting that Christ (who is Himself the Word) speaks "salvation into being: rebuking the chaos of demons, separating men and women from damnation by calling them by name into lives of discipleship, defeating the temper with citations of Scripture, commanding healings, using words of blessing to feed and help (pg. 48)." God's speech is powerful and we cannot take lightly that He has given us the power of speech, albeit not the same power as His, but created in His image, we speak.

My theology professor once remarked that to be made in the image of God means that we, like Him, are makers, too. God has chosen, in His divine wisdom, to allow us to be involved in His work in the world. He has even prepared things for us to do. (Eph. 2:10) We are given the power to speak and to act, but we lack the wisdom, goodness and strength of God so we cannot control our speech and actions as we ought to. Sin is ever our condition for which God offers the remedy of salvation through His Son. God grants us grace, and by His grace which gives us the Spirit our tongues can be tamed and words spoken to His glory.

I, too, will focus on what we should say this Sunday, while not denying that often we say what should never be said. But we are exhorted to "speak the truth in love". Petersen reminds me that our prayers are "answering speech" to God's "initiating speech". As His children, all of our speech is a kind of "answering speech" to the Word spoken first to all creation. What will we say? All around us the world is listening.

Pastor B in Saskatchewan