Page last updated

 


 

Scripture Text (NRSV)

 

Ephesians 6:10-20

 

6:10 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his power.

6:11 Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.

6:12 For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

6:13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to withstand on that evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm.

6:14 Stand therefore, and fasten the belt of truth around your waist, and put on the breastplate of righteousness.

6:15 As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace.

6:16 With all of these, take the shield of faith, with which you will be able to quench all the flaming arrows of the evil one.

6:17 Take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

6:18 Pray in the Spirit at all times in every prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert and always persevere in supplication for all the saints.

6:19 Pray also for me, so that when I speak, a message may be given to me to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel,

6:20 for which I am an ambassador in chains. Pray that I may declare it boldly, as I must speak.

 

Comments:

 

The military language in this passage calls to mind the power of the Roman Empire in the first century. Followers of Christ are to put on the armor of God and remain strong in the face of cosmic evil forces.


Check out the story, "The Whole Armor," by John Duckworth in his book, _Stories that Sneak up on You_ (Fleming H. Revel, 1987). Also available in _High-Impact Worship Dramas_ (Group, 1999). The story is about a man who goes to buy the armor he needs to fight the battle in which he's enrolled to fight. Instead of the girdle of truth (which is so constricting because the truth is one size fits all) the salesman convinces him to buy the Sash of Sincerity (a string which ties around his waist). Instead of the breastplate of righteousness the salesman convinces him to buy the sports shirt of niceness (it has a smiley face embroidered over the pocket). For the shoes of the Gospel the salesman suggests the shoestrings of the Gospel which have crosses all over them. The salesman points out that the crosses will be seen by others and that the better buy would be the socks of the Gospel. They have crosses, too; but the crosses won't be as noticeable. For the shield of faith, the salesman suggests buttons of belief with such slogans as "HONK IF YOU BELIEVE," and "MAKE BELIEVE, NOT WAR." For the helmet of salvation the salesman suggests the headband of security. It is made of absorbent terry cloth which keeps you dry in the heat of battle. For the sword of the spirit the salesman has the tie tack of tolerance. When the man pays for his "armor" by check, he is asked to make it out to B. L. Z. Bub. As the man is leaving the store, Mr. Bub takes a fiery dart and bow from behind the counter. I'm thinking about dressing up as a "slick" sidewalk salesman and pitching these alternatives to members of the congregation early in the service before the sermon.

Don't settle for cheap imitations.

Phil in Maryland


This passage has fueld the theory that a great cosmic battle of good vs evil is underway. I personally find this to be an unhealthy view as it supports many "us" against "them" scenarios (you are either with us or you are against us) that promote fear and polarize us. I want to focus on this text, because I want to grow through it. I know the "armor" is metaphoric, and I agree with being clothed with truth, etc., but not to withstand the attack or the battle. I just don't think of things with such polarity. Help. AC in Iowa.


I preached today from Ephesians and I will use this scripture next week. This week I discussed verse 16 "making the most of the time, because the days are evil." People are always saying, and I have too, "Boy, have I ever had a bad day!" I preached today that it is not the day that is evil, or bad, it is the circumstances that are in the day. God makes every day good! This week I am going to encourage to armor themselves against the evil that we find in the day. I even have a small replication of a midevil armor. I am going to emphasize that we do not have to have such bulky, unweildy armor, all we need to do is to armor ourselves with prayer. But, we must pray as carefully as we would if we were a knight putting on our armor, our lives may depend on it. Just some preliminary thoughts, I hope you all can put some more meat in this for me. Toni


Hehe thanks I am going to take the 'saleslady' idea Girl Preacher here! preachers have been compared to salesman, you know..LOL analogy appropriate... I think I will talk with my Worship Chair this week ask her to be the Costomer... I am going to play up the women and shopping thing... 1/2 off : SALE: 50% off Armor for sale! We women love a sale, right. Cheap store of designer Knock offs... I like the check made out to BLZ BUB... I have preached on full armor several times in past... First time in Bluefield,WV another time on my first appointment... drew a roman soldier and a modern day worker and farmer... this is a good passage, I think the drama will enhance and teach...

TO AC in IOWA... I am praying for you!!! Don't like the unhealthy view of the passage!! LOL Well, the Bible PLAINLY STATES JESUS SAYS EITHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST HIM. THe Bible is the WORD, GOD INSPRIED! TRUE IT you think for one minute that GOD DIDNT really mean what He said, you are so off the mark.

Remember this, HE will separate the SHeep from the Goats... I personally, want to be a sheep...they may be blind and dumb- but sheep are FLAME RETARDANT!!! Goats AREN't!

I do not apoligize for my "INTOLERANT" VIEW as you when you read this will say I have... Refer to other post and and sword of spirit-the tie tack.

I do not apoligize for I am a truth teller for God, and be must beware of the wolves in sheeps clothing...Shepherd are not supposed to be wolves.. Clerically_Blonde and very conservative and evangelical in West OHIO


AC in Iowa and Clerically_Blonde,

I believe you two have very different styles on how you "fight" in the kingdom. AC, you don't see the polarity in the same way as CB, but I do not believe that puts you against Christ. CB, you seem to have a fire in you, but shouting often inspires more anger than change, and people are as likely to discount your words as to take them to heart.

I also recall a point at which Jesus said, "Those who are not against us are for us," when advising the disciples not to discourage others who were working under Jesus' name elsewhere. Let us all keep proclaiming in our different styles so that all people may hear the good news of Jesus Christ.

Michelle


I think I'm going to focus on this pericope. This is a metaphor - to remain shielded against the things that pull us from God.

What I have dificulty is the metaphor of the word of God as a weapon. And I don't want to automatically re-cast it as if making it a 'cupid's arrow," something that's benevolent rather than intended to do bodily harm.

A Monday morning confession.

Sally in GA


Oh - and thanks for the skit idea! I've copied it and I think I'll adapt it for the sermon.

Sally


Perfect Sunday to deal with how we treat people coming home from the war. For ideas on that topic, see the Red Cross pamphlet, "Welcome Home."

No one knows how little protection worldly armor gives than a returning service person. Paul B.


To those struggling with the "war" imagry in this text - in the AHA material for August 24, 1997 the suggest; "War was omnipresent in the 1st century. . . .[but] we don't have to be bound by it [the war imargry] in our time, though. fitness or health would work just as well. so would education." We can suggest proficiency in spiritual skills represented by the armor parts "so that we can confidently counter untruths and misunderstandings. We shorthchange our congregations when we imply that the only way to comat evil is by going to war."

I like the idea of fitness training as a metphore here. If you use the psalm for this week it talks about going from strength to strength when we count on God.

When we use the war language it sounds like the battle is against "others" when in fact the battle is a spiritual battle within our selves. We do not like to acknowledge that we have evil within. When ever I act with anything but love I am permiting evil not only in my life but spilling it out into the world. Look to Corinthians to get the quidlines for love!! [love is kind, love is not envious or boastful or arrogant or rude. It does not inisist on its own way, it is not irritable or resentful, it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things] We often apply this to married couples at their weddings. Maybe it would be very helpful to apply it to ourselves as pastors and as a congregation.

I think is will use love as my strength [armor] againist evil thoughts and actions. Still need some work on this. jmj in mt


Thanks for the drama idea. This is going to be a fun sermon! Pastor Rick in FL


As I have read the posts it seems a lot of us are hung up on war. Is it because of the conflict in Iraq? I think I missed it originally (a long time ago) as this is one of my favorite readings. in vers 12 it begins "for ourstruggle is not against enemies of flesh and blood." it is not herer the war rages on but far from us but yet inside and around us. The battle is spiritual therefore we need spiritual armour. I can't see in this a human conflict but the dire warning that it is not a human conflict. WaynO in NE


jmj in mt - thank you! It put me in mind of a book I have in my library by none other than Joyce Meyer. I'd read some of it several years ago and put it down, because it's not all that -uh- meaty (that sounds critical and I don't mean it to be), but I like her downp-to-earth practical advice. The title of the book is "Battlefield of the Mind." And it says stuff much like your post! I think I'll go home and consult with this some; I think it'll inform this sermon quite well! Hey, if I've used Dr. Phil, I guess I can use Joyce Meyer.

how's this working for you? hahahaha

Sally in GA


As I am putting together some thoughts I find myself commenting against Christian radio for some strange reason. Christian radio (at least in the South) is very evangelistic and wants to present a very "cut and dry" answer for those who are searching (in life and on the radio dial). Right and wrong has to be presented in just a few seconds, along with a solution. Paul is telling us life is not like that. It has many aspects and we need several layers of defenses (pieces of armour) to dealing with life's problems. I know I am going to end up asking for prayers, just like Paul but I haven't figured out the rest. CRP


Right in the middle of this rich batch of metaphors, there seems to be a weak link. The belt is Truth and the breastplate is Righteousness. Faith is the sheild, Salvation the helmet and the sword is the Spirit. But Paul seems th waffle at shoes. "As for shoes, put on..hmm, uh...whatever!'

Or maybe Paul is saying Put on whatever it takes to go into the terrain before you. You may be marching into a swamp or tip-toeing through a briarpatch. You might need snowshoes where the surface is fragile but the drifts are deep. Many folks, preachers included, only have one approach to presenting the gospel of peace. Maybe we need a closet full of shoes, some for clomping around, some for kicking, some for climbing, some for side-stepping and some for standing firm. tom in TN(USA)


I don't feel that this passage inherently fuels "us vs. them" thinking because our battle isn't against flesh and blood, but against the devil and his minions, spiritual enemies who try to prevent God's power to renew and redeem from being experienced by us.


I was thinking on my way home last night that a lazer beam would be a better metaphor than a sword for our day. Many people in our congregations have gone into the hospital and a lazer beam has gone through them healing them inside in many ways without blood, gore or stitches and staples.

The sword of the Spirit is the only offensive part of the armor. The helmet, belt, breastplate, shield and shoes are for our defense our protection against attack. The sword is for reaching out offensively. Not sure what this means or even if it means anything, just an observation.

jmj in mt


Somehow, in reading all the previous posts, I get the impression that many feel the issue here is one of warfare of the human type. Certainly, there are many parallels, but the real issue is not human warfare, but spiritual warfare. It is a war that Satan is waging within us--trying to, in our sinful nature, entice us away from our relationship with God.

That enticement, however, comes from more than just within us. It also comes from without. As one of the dramas that Phil posted noted, enticement to sin comes from television and movies. It also comes from radio, friends, enemies, and just about everything with we come into contact.

Thus, we need to "put on the whole armor of God," because we cannot see, hear, taste, feel, or even imagine the forces aligned against that relationship. And Satan is so powerful and fast that we cannot even know when it is happening. We simply cannot stand by ourselves. We don't have that power. Only with the full array of God's power can we stand up against Satan.

I also see a lot of posts that try to individualize the various parts of the "armor." I don't think that it is necessary to be that specific in any sermon that we present. It is sufficient to recall the temptation of Christ in the wilderness, and his sole response to each of Satan's temptations--"It is written . . .." In Scripture, we find the "belt of truth," the "breastplate of righteousness," etc.

[Clerically_blonde; please remember that, on the Internet, all caps means you are shouting. There is no need (and I, for one, consider it rude) to shout in this forum.]

Dan


Phil In Maryland, Wow! What a great story! However I am having difficulty finding that book from here. Any chance you could give me some more info on that story, How exactly does it end? -Bill in Iowa E-mail me please, porter3man@msn.com


At this point, I'm combining the text from Ephesians and that of John 6:58-68. There we have Jesus saying, "The Spirit gives live; the flesh counts for nothing." Some of his disciples lamenting, "This is a hard teching. Who can accept it?" Lumicon.org has a segment on the John 6 passage called "Tough Talk," which I'm thinking of using as a springboard for this Sunday's message. My plan is to use a clip from either "Hoosiers" or "Remember The Titans" where the coach is giving some tough talk to players. In both films we have players either leaving or threatening to leave. I'm trying to borrow some football equipment from a local college and at the beginning of the sermon take them off of the alter. "What does he mean, 'helmet' of salvation. Oh, this must be it!" and put it on. "Hmmm .. (picking up the shoulder pads), could this be the 'breastplate or righteousness'?" and on and on ...

By now, I should look pretty goofy ... particularly for someone who has no affinity for sports whatsoever.

Jesus was never known for soft words, nor did he encourage soft discipleship. There is, indeed, a spiritual war going on. Satan has lost, and he is in his death throes. Our battle is not against flesh and blood, so the earthly helmets and gear we put on will have no effect whatsoever on the enemy ... or, dare I say, "them." Our opponents only fall to the sword of the spirit; our defense, the breastplate of righteousness, the shield of faith, the helmet of salvation. We head into the battle with the belt of truth and our feet fitted with the readiness of the Gospel of Peace ... always prepared to give an account for what we believe.

Oh, by the way: My Congregational Centering might be a rewrite of Andy Griffith's "What It Was Was Football" into "What It Was Was Church."

Pastor Buzz in TN


Sorry for the typos. I didn't read it through before posting. Buzz


It has occurred to me that the solution to the armor is found by using the Ephesians passage and putting on the armor and then moving to the John passage and using it to discover that the armor you need is found within. From have the Lord Jesus Christ in your heart. Nancy-Wi


I may end with an impromptoo (sorry I just can't spell it) communion where I break two loaves of bread and bless two cups. And pass them through the pews by intiction. Going home to sleep on it! Nancy-Wi


I think of the armor as being covered With the Spirit of God as we go out into the world to minister. That our hearts are focused on loving as Jesus loved, that our words are ones that encourage and speak the truth, that when life threatens, we are aware of our salvation coming from Christ, and not by what standards the world might give us, that are feet are prepared to walk, run, dance or whatever ( I like the different kinds of shoes, not just sandals)we need to do to minister, and shield of faith to block out the attacks from within or outside of ourselves.

I don't get hung up on the armor and war images, even though I am admittedly a pacifist, but just realize that in Paul's world, in prison, that he saw a guard in full armor probably outside his cell. It was probably a stream of consciousness for him of how God protects him in the battles he was fighting, for his very life.

Susan in Wa.


I was involved in a prison ministry once and one of the prisoners came to our session with a New Testament in his shirt pocket. One of the other leaders accused the prisoner of having a knife. The prisoner got upset at being accused and then the leader pointed at the testament and said if the word of God is a sword, then that little testament must be a knife. They had a big laugh, but I thought it was a pretty silly joke. (I didn't have a high opinion of that other leader anyway.) Ever since that time, I have had a bad taste in my mouth in relation to this pericope and I haven't liked Paul's analogies.

Regardless of how we feel about Paul's images in this text, it does not change the reality of a cosmic war between good and evil that rages all around us. When I consider that reality, I am grateful for some equipment that will benefit me (and all believers) when I venture beyond the safety of the sanctuary. I want to grow, too. The only way to grow with the text is to deal with the text. I'll have to get down and wrestle with it, but I remember that Jacob received a blessing when he wrestled with the angel all night. Creature Wayne


Is this not saying that regardless of how we look at it Creation is fallen and because Creation is fallen it struggles. That life is life and because of the fallen state of creation we as Christians must have some way to deal with the issues we face and Paul is using these analogies to give the Christians in the early church a way to deal with the issues of life and, therefore, some insight as to how we can deal with the issue of life as these battles of evil occur? Kathy in NC


Nancy in WI,

"impromptu" :-)

I am wondering why two loaves? Is your congregation too large to use one loaf that is broken into two halves? I can understand why two cups would be used, one on either side of the congregation, but symbolism speaks, and if we confess "one Lord, Jesus Christ," it would be good to use one loaf of bread (if possible).

(If you do break a loaf in half, it is much easier if you use a knife ahead of time to lightly score the crust down the middle.)

Michelle


DPS folks,

Too many of you to thank for your inspiration and dialogue this weekend.

I didn't want to talk about bread AGAIN! ;?)

A colleague, you know who you are Brian, reads often but I don't think posts, like ever... still, he had some wisdom, I told him I was going to use this weekend on this passage. After pulling out a "teady bear" I received from a friend... using the "Knight" theme as I'm a "Night Owl"... the teady bear had been "doctored" up with the "belt is Truth and the breastplate is Righteousness. Faith is the sheild, Salvation the helmet and the sword is the Spirit."

Now, there has to be some literary word for taking a text and twisting it to be exactly what Paul warned against... v 12a says "For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities..."

"As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace..." part of our problem, according to my friend is that we talk about "Peace Keepers" in Iraq, etc. when what we should "be about" is PEACE MAKERS.

Lots of good insights... thanks for the "different shoes image" Tom... THAT will preach too... ;?) It's all about "where we walk... and walking in someone else's shoes..."

pulpitt in ND


Hey ya'll(I'm in the south,can you tell?) Wonderful discussion and interesting inspirations. Thank you. For the one who spoke about Christian radio in the south that fact seems to be true. Another interesting observation I have made in light of this passage is that Christians tend to slay/judge other Christians with the Word. I am constantly reminding my flock that we are to offer the grace of Jesus Christ. No wonder people turn away from church, they come in downtrodden and beaten by the world. May the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Thanks again for the wonderful discussion. Airchp54


As I read this pericope it occured to me that the image of putting on armor doesn't compute too well in today's world. Since knights wearing the kind of full armor described here are only "faiy-tale" images I suspect that the average person isn't aware of how uncomfortable the armor of Roman soldiers (and that of successive generations wearing iron/steel/chain mail) would have been. My title this week is "Rattle, Clank, Squeal" -- remembering how uncomfortable such armor was to wear and to keep in good working order AND how uncomfortable the armor of Christ can be to wear and tend in a world that scorns such conceepts as righteousness, peace, and salvation.

Blessings to all as we work with this text.

Robbie in Central KS


Michelle- yes, it took me a while but I did realize that I can break one loaf, into more than two pieces (LOL) Thanks for prod!

Armor is a term the early Christian would be very familiar. I would guess that most of them did not have any "armor" but were usually on the recieving end of armor use, today we (USA Europe) have the armor, perhaps if we were the ones always being attacked the image of armor would be more defense than offense. I see this text in that context. Today we are under siege by the cultural world. Nancy-Wi


Nancy said, "I may end with an impromptoo (sorry I just can't spell it) communion where I break two loaves of bread and bless two cups."

And Michelle asked, "Why two?"

And I'm wondering why the church, in its various denominational and congregational guises, is always re-inventing the Eucharist? For centuries, the church universal has been celebrating the Holy Mysteries -- one cup blessed and shared, one loaf blessed, broken, and distributed -- following the institution of our Lord at that last supper in the upper room. Why do we continually tinker with it?

Blessings, Eric in OH


Eric- I will bless one of each and then divide the cup in two one for each side of the church which is no different than make 100 small cups! Sorry I didn't read that post more carefully! Blessing Nancy-Wi


For those working with the "shoes" theme - my first thought when I read through the pericope was "How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the gospel of peace." Not where I'm going, though.

I'm thinking of the phrase "the truth hurts."

there is a very real truth hurting our congregation. And that is that we cannot seem to overcome the racial barrier, primarily because there are some who flat-out will not accept persons other than those who are just like they are. If I came straight out and said, "this church will continue to decline until the members' attitude changes," it would really hurt their feelings. God will not bless a church that insists on attitudes that are counter to his teaching.

And, speaking of radio preaching, I heard a radio preacher once say that the devil likes nothing better than to divide the body of Christ. So true! It's divide and conquer. If we're all bickering, it leaves us with a huge blind spot that will allow evil and sin to seep into us and eventually take over. So, rather than let that happen, put on the Gospel armor.

And, as someone noted, the armor will probably be uncomfortable. The truth hurts.

Sally in GA


I just thought of a title: how does this sound?

"Who Does the Truth Hurt?"

We'd like for that sword of the Spirit that is the Gospel to be our own interpretation of the Gospel and for it to pierce others' defenses, but sometimes we've got to let the truth hurt us, too, in order to conform to Christ.

Sally in GA

 


Here's something from Heidi Hustead in "The Christian Century" from 2000

"If anything can help us decide to live in obedience to God’s word it is knowing God’s heart. Our disobedience and our abstinence break God’s heart. Perhaps knowing that might help us make better choices today and tomorrow."

Abstinence is not always a good thing. We keep trying to starve ourselves spiritually.

Sally in GA

 


Great discussion. I will use the idea that "They" (spouse, child, boss, peacher, Iraqis, Muslems, Demos, Republicans, ACLU, etc) are NOT the enemy. The enemy is Satan and his demons, pure and simple. I use this in couples counseling with good effect.

Shine in Texas


I find verses 18-20 to be an interesting final thought for this set of instructions. After the instructions to put on the "whole armor of God", the writer further instructs that they should "pray in the Spirit at all times." Often we come under spiritual attack when we are so filled with the Spirit. Therefore, being armed before we pray would be good words of advice. Vs. 19 could be an entire sermon for preachers everywhere. We have a serious task before us any time that we step into a pulpit to proclaim the Gospel. Do we always take it so seriously, and are our messages a word from the Lord, or are they often devised out of our own heads in an effort the fill the expected allotment of time, or an effort to entertain? We sincerely need to invite our congregations to put on the armor and pray with all sincerity, that the words that come from our mouths will be words of truth that will "make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel.

Peace to you, Donna in Alabama


not really meaning to be mischievous, but...

why reinvent the wheel?

if we hadn't, we never would have come up with the rubber tyre.

same concept, different context.

reinvention is not the enemy.

:-)

kc in sydney


again referring to the reinvention fo the eucharist query:

Eric in OH, do you do the eucharist in koine greek? aramaic? latin?

reinvention is about trying to communicate faithfully an old idea/truth/cocept in a new context - language and form are not that easily separable.

change for change sake might be destructive, but trying to speak in languages and forms that people understand is our inheritance since pentecost.

for me, reinvention is linked to the point of pentecost. the point was not that people could speak in different languages, it was that by the power of the Spirit people could hear in their own language. the birth of the church and the mandate given to us was to speak in ways people understand so that they might experience the Gospel.

not trying to bash you over the head Eric in OH, just throwing some alternatives your way.

:-)

kc in sydney


not really meaning to be mischievous, but...

why reinvent the wheel?

if we hadn't, we never would have come up with the rubber tyre.

same concept, different context.

reinvention is not the enemy.

:-)

kc in sydney


"not trying to bash you over the head Eric in OH, just throwing some alternatives your way."

Not a problem, kc ... but what I understand you to be describing is inculturation, not reinvention.

We may change the language of our celebrations, we may use a wooden bowl instead of a silver chalice, we may use the local flatbread (whatever it may be), etc.

But the basics of the Eucharist remain as given by Jesus -- one loaf, one cup -- and the four-part action of taking, blessing, breaking, and sharing.

Blessings, Eric in OH


I have no doubt that most of you have already finished for the week (LOL) But as I was sitting down to the computer, looking at the blank screen that had only the title of the sermon on it, the image that popped into my mind was Clark Kent ducking into the phone booth to change into Superman. Is that a modern metaphor for the armor? I also remember the first Christopher Reeve Superman movie, when Clark Kent tries to find an old-fashioned phone booth and the only thing available are these plastic half-things like you find in airports. No place to go inside to change into the armor. Is that where we are today? Just musing. JFJ in Baltimore


Superman might work, where the heck did he change? I didn't see the movie.

We often think that armor is designed to protect the body, but here as I read it is really designed to protect our faith. I think of Bonehoeffer, the Nazi's had his body but not his soul, the heart of his faith. Nancy-Wi


OK, I'm still stuck. I'm an ambassador in chains (hehehe). I don't like any of my ideas.

I have, however, decided to combine this with the OT and Gospel readings ... decide who you're going to serve. We can't continue to give credence to idols, dabbling in idolotry (Heidi Hustead) while donning the Christian armor (God's uniform, from a sermon on the members' page).

The thing is, we "dabble in idolotry" all the time. I'm not just talking about reading our horoscopes for so-called fun, but the more toxic form of idolotry - recasting the Gospel message to conform to our own prejudices, desires, and hardheartedness. We melt down and re-cast that iron to conform to ourselves so it's more confortable. Spiritually speaking, we have fallen into the idolotry of placing our comfort above God.

So, there's the sin. The reconciliation comes from the Gospel - the Gospel armor - that will be more comfortable and lighter as we condition ourselves to wear it.

Someone had a great quote from Calvin about the breastplate of righteousness, vs. the belt of righteousness (or something like that). Actually, a breastplate of righteousness sounds a propos ... especially when compared the the puffed-out breast of self-righteousness. (tongue in cheek)

I still don't have a title!!!

Sally


Dear Clerically-Blonde: Again I am saddened by the yelling and intolerance we Christians seem to have for one another... how can we ever be bearers of Christ's light in the world when we can't even be civil to one another. The Spirit calls each of us to serve Christ in the world, why do we divide ourselves off from one another? Is that what the armor of God passage is saying here? No, it is not. We need to fight the evil that exists in the world, yes. But we also need to remember that name calling and screaming at others is not a way to break barriers down so that Christ's love can enter in. It simply ensures that the folks we are screaming at will build stronger walls. May God help us all to act in loving and just ways. May we truly wear the full armor of God.