Sermons:
-
Every Penny Counts, Mark 12:38-44 (see below)
by Rev. Randy L Quinn
-
No More
Guilt Trips,
Hebrews 9:24-28, by Rev.
Frank Schaefer
-
A
Certain Widow,
Mark
12:38-44,
by Dr. David Rogne
-
Nothing Left To Give?, Mark
12:38-44,
by F. Schaefer
-
Facing Our Fiscal & Christian Responsibilities,
Mark 12: 13-17,
by Rev. Elaine Wing
God Provides,
Ruth 3:1-5; 4:13-17,
by Thomas
Hall
-
The Savvy Investor,
Mark 12:38-44,
by Lisa in So. IL
-
What Can We Bring to the Table? John
6:4-14,
Topic: Stewardship,
by Don Bower
______________________________________________________________
Every Penny Counts
a sermon based on Mark 12:38-44
by Rev. Randy L Quinn
Every November I am reminded of the one time I ran for public office.
You probably remember seeing my name in the newspapers that year, don’t
you? I ran for a Water District Commissioner position; I ran un-opposed
and lost – to a write-in candidate who received 100% of the vote.
We were just forming the North Whidbey Water District, and Washington
State law requires there to be at least three Commissioners in every
water district. The Commissioners must live within the District and can
only be voted on by residents of the District.
At the time, our family’s home was the only residence in the North
Whidbey Water District – there were other property owners and soon there
were additional residences, but at the time, we were the only people who
resided there. Since it was a new District, we had three open positions
and four eligible voters.
One was a six year term, one was a four year term, and one was a two
year term; in succeeding elections, they would all be six year terms.
Dad was running un-opposed for the six-year term; I was running for four
years; my brother Kelly was running for two. But after the ballots were
printed, we realized that I would be graduating from college before the
end of my four-year term. So we all agreed to write Kelly’s name on my
position and my name on his.
So, in the same election that I lost, I beat an un-opposed
candidate as a write-in candidate myself.
We didn’t ask for a recount. We knew all the voters and how they
voted.
Still, I am a little surprised no one remembers it. J
Our text today reminds me of a part of the election process that not
many people consider – the Federal Elections Commission disclosure
statements. All candidates for public office fill out a form stating
their assets and income.
The form has its history in the stories of abuse by previously
elected officials. It is an attempt to make public a person’s financial
status so that potential conflicts of interest can be identified.
And on occasion there been stories in the press that come from those
“public” disclosures of candidates. Of course the question I want to ask
is if their publicly professed faith shows up in their charitable
giving. But I only remember one time in recent history when the press
specifically reported about a candidate’s charitable giving. That
candidate gave a tenth of his income to charity. His name was Joseph
Lieberman.
I’m not sure that should be the only measuring rod we use for
political candidates, but it does make me wonder how many of us would
pass the test of public scrutiny.
Before I became a pastor, I attended a church that posted a list
every month of the people and the amounts of money each had given. (As a
pastor, I’ve never suggested doing that – and have personally tried not
to know how much is given by individuals or families in the church.) It
made me feel a little uncomfortable knowing that what I gave was a
matter of public record – even though I knew I was giving what I felt
was an appropriate amount for me.
I think that kind of public knowledge of giving must have been a part
of the culture of Jesus’ day, though. The offering boxes were hung along
the walls of the temple and people would deposit their offering in full
view of the crowds.
While it was possible to make offerings at a time when fewer people
would notice, it was not possible to write a check and there was no
paper money. Everyone could hear how many coins dropped into the boxes,
and with a little practice, I’m sure people learned to distinguish
between the “mite” and the “denarius”.
I also imagine there were some who waited until the major festivals
to make their offerings – that way more people would witness their
‘faithful’ giving – even if some people gave smaller amounts more often,
providing a cumulative amount that was even larger.
I remember one woman in a church who wanted me to know how generous
she was as she provided a sizeable check to the church. What I didn’t
tell her was that I had personally given more than that over the course
of the year. Her check didn’t impress me the way she had intended it to
impress me. [continue]
|